What are three components of modern privacy?

	1.	Personal privacy involving issues of bodily integrity, public privacy involving protection of one's privacy in public, and privacy of personal information involving the security of sensitive information.
	2.	Domestic privacy protecting one's privacy within the nation's borders, international privacy protecting one's privacy in the world more broadly, personal privacy protecting one's personal privacy and bodily integrity.
	3.	Personal privacy involving issues of bodily integrity, territorial privacy involving protection of one's home and physical spaces, and privacy of personal information involving the security of sensitive information.
	4.	Personal privacy involving issues of bodily integrity, familial privacy involving protection of one's privacy within the family home and family spaces, and privacy of personal information involving the security of sensitive information.
	5.	Personal privacy involving issues of bodily integrity, vehicular privacy involving protection of one's vehicle and privacy of personal information involving the security of sensitive information.

2.

To establish negligence, a plaintiff must prove:

	1.	that, on the balance of probabilities and beyond a reasonable doubt, the defendent owed the plaintiff a duty of care, breached the required standard of care, that the plaintiff suffered injury or damage and the defendant's conduct caused the plaintiff's damage
	2.	that, beyond a reasonable doubt, the defendent owed the plaintiff a duty of care, breached the required standard of care, and the defendant's conduct was the cause. If you prove causation, it is not necessary to prove damages or that any harm was suffered. It is the principle of the thing - that it happened at all - that matters.
	3.	that, beyond a reasonable doubt, the defendent owed the plaintiff a duty of care, breached the required standard of care, that the plaintiff suffered injury or damage and the defendant's conduct caused the plaintiff's damage
	4.	that, on the balance of probabilities, the defendent owed the plaintiff a duty of care, breached the required standard of care, and the defendant's conduct was the cause. If you prove causation, it is not necessary to prove damages or that any harm was suffered. It is the principle of the thing - that it happened at all - that matters.
	5.	that, on the balance of probabilities, the defendent owed the plaintiff a duty of care, breached the required standard of care, that the plaintiff suffered injury or damage and the defendant's conduct caused the plaintiff's damage

3.

Manufacturers in Canada have which of the following defences to a product liability negligenceaction?

	1.	Sometime between the production of the product and the consumer who was harmed by it, there was an intervening inspection or modification of the product.
	2.	The manufacturer has a waiver of liability agreement with the distributor of the product.
	3.	None of the above.
	4.	The product was in its original packaging.
	5.	The manufacturer assumed the person using the product in a normal manner contributed to his own damages.

4.

How is priority determined in the PPSA system?

	1.	Generally, priority is assigned to the debtor that first perfects their interest, who is also usually the first to register.
	2.	Generally, priority is assigned to the creditor that first perfects their interest, who is also usually the last and therefore the most recent to register.
	3.	none of the above.
	4.	Generally, no priority is assigned to creditors. There is usually enough to go around for all of them.
	5.	Generally, priority is assigned to the creditor that first perfects their interest, who is also usually the first to register.

5.