What connections should government agents have to show in order to justify the application of the provisions of the USA PATRIOT Act? What are the potential advantages and drawbacks to a very liberal interpretation of powers granted by the USA PATRIOT Act? For example, should the end result of investigations justify the tactics used? In other words, if the investigation does reveal potentially dangerous terrorist activities, should this justify the tactics investigators used even if, under normal circumstances, those tactics might be overreaching or even illegal? Explain.