1. What do you believe the framers meant when they wrote about a "well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state"? Explain your reasoning.
2. If you disagree with the Court's 2008 and 2010 decisions, then how do you interpret the Second Amendment's explicit statement that "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"? Explain your reasoning.
3. If the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to bear arms, then what, if any, are the appropriate limits to that right? And, who should set those limits: democratically elected legislators or appointed, life-time tenured judges?