What

do

you

feel

are

the

most

serious

methodological

problems

associated

with

Gordon?s

model?

Outline

your

argument

and

carry

out

a

review

of

relevant

financial

academic

literature

and

identify

at

least

two

alternative

cost

of

equity

estimation

methods.

Can

these

identified

methods

be

better

than

Gordon?s

model?

Argue

your

case.

MPF753 T2 2016 - Assignment Part 2 Due by: 4:59PM Monday, 5 th Sept 2016 The dividend discount model is a well-known model for pricing equity shares using the time value of money concept whereby the current fair price of a share is evaluated as the present value of future expected dividends. In a relatively simple version of this model, it is assumed that the annual growth rate of dividends is constant and the current fair price of a share is obtained as next period's dividend divided by the difference between the expected annual return on equity and the constant annual growth rate of dividends. When the current price of a share is already known (e.g. by looking up the publicly available market information on the share prices), the constant dividend growth model (also called Gordon's model) can be inverted derive the annual return expected by the equity- holders of a certain stock. This is a methodology sometimes used to estimate the cost of equity capital for a firm. As your Assignment Part - 2 for MPF753-Finance in T2, 2016, you are required to apply Gordon's model in estimating the cost of equity capital of a firm using real data drawn from a financial database. a) Choose three Australian listed companies (one each from three different sectors) that have been in business for at least the last ten years. Access Morningstar Datanalysis Premium via the Deakin library (refer to the Assignment Part - 2 instructions document). Download onto a spreadsheet the last ten years (01/07/06 to 30/06/16) of dividend payments history for each of your three chosen companies. (2 marks) b) All interim dividends must be appropriately annualized before adding up with the year-end final dividends in order to determine the true dollar value of yearly dividends received by the shareholders. For companies that have paid interim dividends, assume that those dividends were paid at the end of the first half of the year and therefore earn six months of interest at a risk-free rate for the next half. The current Australian Government 10-year bonds rate is 1.92% p.a. (3 marks) c) After determining the dollar dividends received by shareholders for each of the past ten years, compute and justify a proxy annual constant growth rate of dividends to be used in Gordon's model. Use your computed proxy annual constant growth rate to predict next year's dollar dividend value. (5 marks) d) Go to www.yahoo.com.au/finance and look up the closing price of each of your three chosen stocks as on 30/06/2016. Use Gordon's model to solve for the expected return on equity for each of the stocks. Do these expected return figures appear justified given the nature of the business, the overall market conditions and the industrial sectors within which each of your chosen companies operate? Explain. (8 marks) e) What do you feel are the most serious methodological problems associated with Gordon's model? Outline your argument and carry out a review of relevant financial academic literature and identify at least two alternative cost of equity estimation methods. Can these identified methods be better than Gordon's model? Argue your case. (Maximum 1300 words for part (e)) (12 marks) This assignment carries a total assessment weight of 30% in this unit. (Carefully read the separately posted Assignment Part - 2 instructions document before proceeding)