What do you find to be the most startling/disturbing/interesting fact about the media coverage Agran received in his presidential run? Do you agree with the "National Journalistic Logic" that Meyrowitz describes, or the "Public Logic?" Why? In your opinion, how have new technologies (cell phones, social media, etc.) changed the way we cover presidential candidates? Is the "National Journalistic Logic" still viable given these new technologies? In other words, can the same excuses national journalists used for not covering Agran still be used? Why or why not? articles referred to is "the problem of getting on the media agenda" by Joshua Meyrowitz.. I will like