what do you think is good feedback to summary of an analysis: In my paper, I stated that the water contamination incident at the triathlon event presented a significant public relations challenge to the participating water companies. The primary public relations issue was restoring public trust while addressing concerns about event safety, accountability, and communication transparency. Despite the gravity of the situation, the analysis suggests using a reactive rather than proactive crisis management strategy. While the article emphasizes the significance of communication, collaboration, and transparency in dealing with the crisis, the public relations strategies and tactics employed were insufficient to mitigate the damage to the companies' reputations. The paper contained numerous references to open communication, community engagement, and collaboration with government agencies! Furthermore, while regular water testing and reporting results were emphasized as critical, there appeared to be a gap in addressing the immediate concerns of affected individuals and the larger community. The need for concrete plans or measures to prevent future incidents, such as improved monitoring technology or regulatory compliance, calls into question the long-term effectiveness of the public relations response. Finally, the article discusses various principles of crisis communication and emphasizes the importance of restoring trust and transparency