What is at stake for the key parties, including the firm?

What are the likely positions of Steve and Gary. What will you say to counteract those positions?

Are there any levers you can use to get your point across? Explain.

What is your most powerful and persuasive response to the reasons and rationalizations you need to address?

1.Describe the leadership style of Steve in this case.

2.Assume Steve decides to support Gary's explanation for choosing the firm's own package. What will you do next?

3.Have there been any violations of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct in this case? Be specific.