What is the difference b/w the two examples below? Which is the better introduction to a discussion of a statute?

1) Under kent Criminal Law $10 (a), a person is guilty of burglary in the third degree if he "knowingly and unlawfully either enters or remains in a building , with the intent to commit a crime."

2) Smith is guilty of a burglary in the third degree because he fulfills all of the elements of the crime.