What would the opposite mode of moral thinking be like? In

other words, what does it imply that we reversely subject <2>

to <1>?

Would that be Kantian or Utilitarian? Why?

We as moral agents find ourselves being caught up in a

particular context defined by the two different "forces," if

you will:

<1> the "rigid" nature of human states of affairs,

where we happen to fall under and are subject to

the constraints therein, on the one hand, and

<2> our "inherent" drive (stemming from our desires

as well as obligations) to make the right choice,

or at least a best one with good intentions, on

the other hand.

Given that these above two, <1> & <2>, are, respectively,

external and internal, we are bound to ponder about the mode

and extent to which these two forces from opposite directions

"interact" with each other in the name of pursuit of moral

goodness and righteousness as human ideal.