What Would You Do? You are a police officer patrolling an inner-city neighborhood. You come across a group of teens who seem to be acting suspiciously. As you approach them, you see that they are in possession of various items, including a car audio system, a laptop, and some cell phones. After running the serial numbers, you discover that the items are stolen. Upon questioning the teens, two of them admit to stealing the items, one admits to attempting to buy some of the items, and the other claims he is not involved with the stolen property and was only talking to some friends. Trey is the teen claiming to have no involvement with the crime. You run a background check and discover that he has been on probation for burglary in the past and is currently involved in community-based treatment for robbery. You must decide whether or not to take Trey into custody with the others for possession of the stolen items. You decide not to take Trey into custody. Although he has been in trouble in the past, you have no evidence of his being involved with these stolen items. You decide to take Trey into custody. He was with as the others and with his background you believe that he is involved with the stolen property