When a defendant claims that the government entrapped him by inducing him to break the law, prosecution must prove the following: a. Prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was predisposed to commit the b. Prove that the defendant knew the wrongful nature of the crime and could control his actions c. Prove actus reus by a preponderance of the evidence d. Prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant had malicious intent to commit the prohibited act e. Prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant was predisposed to commit the crime and had the specific intent to do so