Question
When it started in 2017, Multi-Jeux was a small video game design firm. His staff included a total of two designers all reporting to the
When it started in 2017, Multi-Jeux was a small video game design firm. His staff included a total of two designers all reporting to the owner of
the company, Mr. Payment. In recent years, the number of employees has steadily to increase. In 2023, Multi-Jeux now has twelve designers, divided into two teams each with their own supervisor.
In December 2022, Team 1 of Multi-Jeux completed the design of the new video game titled “Zero-Pandemia” and based on the board game “Pandemia”. The game was not good welcomed by Bob, the supervisor of team 1. Bob being very busy managing several projects, expected at the very end of the project on January 30, 2023, close to the annual evaluation period to test the game designed by his team. Following his test, Bob sent the designers on his team an email containing the following comments:
The story is known and interesting, which makes the preamble understandable. Each of the characters in this real-time strategy game is charismatic.
However, the controls are complicated and poorly explained; the graphics are ugly; them animations are weak; some content does not work (there are many bugs and glitches); the texts are full of grammatical and typographical errors, such as the victory message that says: "YOU'RE WINNER!. Also, blows are inevitable, the Stupid weapons and confusing enemies ensure characters die fast!
Bob concludes his email by indicating that he has accepted the poor performance of his team so far, but that they should improve in the future Following the comments of the supervisor of team 1, Mr. Paiement considers retain the bonus for the year 2022 (normally paid on March 30 of the following year) of the six Team 1 designers who worked on the Zero-Pandemic game.
During 2019, to justify the granting or refusal of promotions to members of its team, Mr. Paiement has set up an informal process to evaluate his subordinates as he wants it, when he wants it, according to his own criteria, which often vary according to the employee rated and timing. In recent months, both Team 1 and Team 2 designers began to complain about a lack of uniformity in performance management. They are also concerned about the consequences that this lack of formalization will have when decide on the granting of performance bonuses.
Question:
Depending on their performance, instead of withholding the bonus from the members of team 1,Could Mr. Payment suspend them immediately without pay? Explain why and what
what he should do instead, if need be.
Yes/No
Why?
What should Mr. Payment do, if anything?
Step by Step Solution
3.49 Rating (169 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Yes Mr Payment could suspend the members of team 1 immediately without pay depending on their perfor...Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started