When Rights Conflict: R. v. Oakes, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 103

• how s. 1 both guarantees and limitsCharterrights? Why does the government have to justify limiting a person's rights?
• the significance of the R v Oakes case.
• should ever be limits toCharterrights? Why or why not?
• a situation where an infringement of a right would be justified.
• a situation where an infringement of aCharterright would not be justified?
• Opiinon about the courts' role in deciding whether an infringement of a right can be justified?
• What happens if the government cannot show that aCharterinfringement is justified ( it does not satisfy the elements of the s. 1 analysis)?
• If a law is declared to have no force or effect, can Parliament or the legislature make anything about it?