When scholars discuss the growing importance of nationalism in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, they often distinguish between so-called "positive" and "negative" variants. What aspects or results of nationalism would you consider positive and what negative? Looking at World War One and its antecedents, do you believe that such distinctions are valid? Why or why not? Looking to contemporary events, do you believe that these ideas can be applied to the nation-building situation going on right now in Afghanistan and Iraq? Finally, are such distinctions still valid in the 21st century as we increasingly face global challenges such as global climate change and world-wide pandemics such as coronavirus?

I KNOW CHEGG IS SCAM WITH A BUNCH OF USELESS PEOPLE BUT IF ANYONE WITH A BRAIN CAN HELP WITH THESE QUESTIONS THAT WOULD BE GREAT!