Which is an accurate statement of the law with regards to the relationship between the probative value of evidence and its potential to confuse the finder of fact? Which is an accurate statement of the law with regards to the relationship between the probative value of evidence and its potential to confuse the finder of fact? The Federal Rules of Evidence exclude evidence when the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the risk of confusing the finder of fact. The Federal Rules of Evidence only admit evidence when the risk of confusing the finder of fact is substantially outweighed by the probative value. The Federal Rules of Evidence do not admit evidence when the probative value of the evidence is equal to the risk of confusing the finder of fact. There is no relationship between the probative value of evidence and its risk of confusing the finder of fact