Which of the company's arguments for independent contractor status are most compelling? Which of the union's arguments for employee status are most compelling?Is this simply a case of who wins more of the nine factors? Or are some factors more important than others? if so whivh ones in this case are more important?If you were an administrative law judge qorking for the NLRB, how would you rule in this case and why?

~00 3.5 Inc 5!... I. .. airs-m $00... .33 grow Frmm 2.: 5n cad53. monk. Von-can :3 E8. an #3 ova? Danna a 93mm _. 8.5 98%: :meann _. Hr om 818 32.5\" M... gang nBEonm . Engages 3m 35: who . . ' . macaw 9.00m $03 5.5 maa #5. 9.05 no 50 Quake? 3m 33.? mac N Magmaog 3%.. 34$ SSE maa 322$ V. :85me @143. 13,3 Ema Emu . 33me omamwmm Nona mmacnaos 832m 9BR- a\": uni g @925 9 $00. w. ~55an 383 $5.33 Elo 5% En Ev 3.5an arm 55%... g 35%. anw mmmvsmou 832. :m