Which of the following are true statements regarding the sufficiency of a writing to satisfy the Statute of Frauds? $($Check all that apply$)$

a$.$

The general rule is that a court will look for some writing, signed by the party to be bound.

b$.$

A memorandum or note is never sufficient, even if it contains the required terms.

c$.$

A writing must sufficiently identify the parties to the contract.

d$.$

Electronically signed documents cannot satisfy the statute of frauds.