Which of the following best describes a problem unique to the "Strong Realism" thesis? O The view that morality does not apply to war has implications that very few (if any) people would be willing to accept - including advocates of the Strong Realism thesis. If there are no true moral judgments about war, then the following must be false: (1) It was morally wrong to firebomb civilian areas in Tokyo and other Japanese cities and towns at the end of World War II; (2) It was not morally wrong to firebomb civilian areas in Tokyo and other Japanese cities and towns at the end of World War II. The problem is that if (1) is false, then (2) is true. Similarly, if (2) is false, then (1) is true. It cannot be the case, then, that there are no true moral judgments about war. A version of Realism that suggests otherwise is logically flawed and indefensible. O People make moral judgments about war and political violence all the time. If this is the case, then clearly it is possible to make moral judgments about war. O Making moral judgments about war is not pointless. The point of making such judgments is to curb the excesses of war.