Which of the following best describes Rawls's argument for why the state is justified in redistributing wealth from the financially better off to the less-well off? a. Even though the wealthy deserve their wealth, the state should redistribute wealth in order to prevent the social unrest caused by economic inequality. b. To the extent that a person's financial success is influenced by innate abilities and the family you were born into, you can't claim credit for that portion of your success, therefore the state has a right to take that wealth and distribute it to those who are less fortunate. c. A feeling of compassion is sufficient reason for a state to redistribute wealth. d. The state should redistribute wealth in order to model the virtue of generosity to its citizens