Which of the following best represents Robert Nozick's theory of why it is morally okay for any given person to appropriate unowned natural resources?

Group of answer choices

It's okay to take a set of resources just as long as doing so doesn't deprive anyone else of any property that they owned before this set of resources was taken.

It's okay to take an unowned set of resources, even if it makes some other people significantly worse off than if the resources hadn't been taken.

It's okay to take an unowned set of resources just as long as doing so makes the poorest people in society at least somewhat better off.

It's okay to take an unowned set of resources just as long as doing so is done with the explicit express consent of the rest of society.