Which of the following is NOT a reason in support of strict product liability? Manufacturers can purchase product liability insurance. Product manufacturing costs should be as low as possible. Manufacturers should have an incentive to produce safe products. Consumers should be warned of potential risk of harm while using the product. Vic is an experienced forkift user. Vic purchased a Volvo forkift for use in moving iterns within his warehouse. The forklift requires drivers to be in their seat while operating the forklift. If the driver exits from the seat, a safety switch shuts off the forklift: Vic sometimes finds it heipful to stand while operating the forkdift, so he disconnected the safety switch. While standing on the running forklit, Vic fell off and the forklift ran over him. He has now sued Volvo to compensate him for his injuries. What will be the result? Vic will win because he is an experienced forklift user. Vic will win because the forkift caused his injuries. Vic will win because volvo is a manufacturer of forklifts. Vic wall lose because the forkift was not in the sarne condition that it wos in when he bought it Dee purchased an electric can opener from her co-worker. When Dee was using the can opener, it exploded and sent pieces of metal and plastic onto Dee's face and eyes. Dee wants to file a lawsuit because the can opener was defective and caused her injury. Who can Dee collect damages from? The retaler who sold the can opener to the co worker, and the manufacturer of the can opener The manufacturer of the can opener only The co worker only Deesco wanker, the retailer who sod the can opener to the co-worker, and the manutocturer of the can opener Nasty Brand Week Killer is used for killing weeds, The package has many warnings that Nasty is a dangerous product that should be kept away from human's face and eyes. Fern suttered damage to her face when some Nasty splashed her in the eyes. What must she prove in order to collect damages from Nasty? That Nasty used the cheapest materials avaliable to produce its product That she was injured when Nasty splashed in her eyes That Narty was not wery effective in kiling weeds That a safer aiternative formula for Nasty was ayaliable, and that as a result of the failure of Nasty to adopt the alternative design. the proouct was not teaspnably safe. Ubman Company makes ladders. Zelda purchased a Lbman ladder from Wal-Mart store. She suffered injuries while using the ladder. Zelda discovers that her Libman ladder is defective and sues Libman for product liability based on strict liability. In order to collect damages, she must show that She bought the ladder from Libman. She assumed the risk of using a ladder. The Ladder was in a defective condition when Libmansold it. She is normally engaged in the business use of ladders
