Which of the following is the correct write-up for the interaction and (if significant) follow-up simple effects tests?

1. The interaction of Question Condition X Interrogator Condition was not significant, F(1, 116) = 5.25, p > .05. Since this is not significant, there was no need to run simple effects follow-up tests.
2. The interaction of Question Condition X Interrogator Condition was not significant, F(1, 120) = 5.25, p > .05. Since this is not significant, there was no need to run simple effects follow-up tests.
3. The interaction of Question Condition X Interrogator Condition was significant, F(1, 116) = 5.25, p
4. The interaction of Question Condition X Interrogator Condition was significant, F(1, 120) = 5.25, p
5. The interaction of Question Condition X Interrogator Condition was significant, F(1, 120) = 5.25, p

You run a Two Way AVOVA on this data set and get the following SPSS output (next page). Using this output, interpret the information. Between-Subjects Factors Value Label N Interrogator (Prosecution Prosecution 60 vs Defense) - N Defense 60 Question (Smashed = 1 Smashed 60 Hit = 2) N Hit 60 Descriptive Statistics Dependent Variable: Speed Estimate Interrogator (Prosecution Question (Smashed = 1, vs Defense) Hit = 2) Mean Std. Deviation N Prosecution Smashed 41.50 5.619 30 Hit 36.53 6.135 30 Total 39.02 6.347 60 Defense Smashed 36.77 7.899 30 Hit 37.53 7.491 30 Total 37.15 7.642 60 Total Smashed 39.13 7.203 60 Hit 37.03 6.807 60 Total 38.08 7.057 120 Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Dependent Variable: Speed Estimate Type Ill Sum Source of Squares df Mean Square F Sig Corrected Model 483.367 W 161.122 3.433 019 Intercept 174040.833 174040.833 3708.574 000 Interrogator 104.533 104.533 2.227 138 QuestionCondition 132.300 132.300 2.819 096 Interrogator * 246.533 246.533 5.253 024 QuestionCondition Error 5443.800 116 46.929 Total 179968.000 120 Corrected Total 5927.167 119Choose the correct interpretation of the Tests of Between Subjects Effects: O There is one significant main effect, one non-significant main effect, and one significant interaction O There are two significant main effects and one significant interaction O There are no significant main effects and one significant interaction O There is one significant main effect, one non-significant main effect, and one non- significant interaction O There are two significant main effects and one non-significant interactionWhich of the following is the accurate APA format for writing out the question condition main effect (smashed vs hit) and the dependent variable? 0 We ran a univariate ANOVA with question condition (smashed vs hit) and interrogator (Prosecution vs Defense) as our two independent variables and speed estimate as the dependent variable. There was no signicant main effect for question condition, F(1, 120) = 2.82, p > .05. Participants did not estimate the speed differently in the smashed condition (M = 39.13, SD = 7.20) versus the hit condition (M = 37.03, SD = 6.81). Q We ran a univariate ANOVA with question condition (smashed vs hit) and interrogator (Prosecution vs Defense) as our two independent variables and speed estimate as the dependent variable. There was no signicant main effect for question condition, F(1, 116) = 2.82, p > .05. Participants did not estimate the speed differently in the smashed condition (M = 39.13, SD = 7.20) versus the hit condition (M = 37.03, SD = 6.81). Q We ran a univariate ANOVA with question condition (smashed vs hit) and interrogator (Prosecution vs Defense) as our two independent variables and speed estimate as the dependent variable. There was no signicant main effect for question condition, F(1, 116) = 2.82, p > .05. Participants did not estimate the speed differently in the smashed condition (M = 39.02, SD = 6.35) versus the hit condition (M = 37.15, SD = 7.64). Q We ran a univariate ANOVA with question condition (smashed vs hit) and interrogatory (Prosecution vs Defense) as our two independent variables and speed estimate as the dependent variable. There was a signicant main effect for question condition, F(1, 116) = 2.82, p