Question
Which of the following sets of cases support the contract amendment principle enunciated in Stilk v Myrick? Question 25 options: Francis v. Canadian Imperial Bank
Which of the following sets of cases support the contract amendment principle enunciated in Stilk v Myrick?
Question 25 options:
| Francis v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, 1994 CanLII 1578 (ON CA); Rejdak v. Fight Network Inc., 2008 CanLII 37909 (ON SC); Quach v. Mitrux Services Ltd., 2020 BCCA 25 (CanLII); Singh v. Empire Life Ins. Co., 2002 BCCA 452 (CanLII); Rosas v. Toca, 2018 BCCA 191 (CanLII); Alp Electric Ltd. v. Avasarala, 2021 BCCRT 1034 (CanLII) |
| Francis v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, 1994 CanLII 1578 (ON CA); Rejdak v. Fight Network Inc., 2008 CanLII 37909 (ON SC); Quach v. Mitrux Services Ltd., 2020 BCCA 25 (CanLII); Singh v. Empire Life Ins. Co., 2002 BCCA 452 (CanLII); Alp Electric Ltd. v. Avasarala, 2021 BCCRT 1034 (CanLII) |
| Francis v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, 1994 CanLII 1578 (ON CA); Rejdak v. Fight Network Inc., 2008 CanLII 37909 (ON SC); Quach v. Mitrux Services Ltd., 2020 BCCA 25 (CanLII); Singh v. Empire Life Ins. Co., 2002 BCCA 452 (CanLII) |
| Francis v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, 1994 CanLII 1578 (ON CA); Rejdak v. Fight Network Inc., 2008 CanLII 37909 (ON SC); Quach v. Mitrux Services Ltd., 2020 BCCA 25 (CanLII); Singh v. Empire Life Ins. Co., 2002 BCCA 452 (CanLII); Rosas v. Toca, 2018 BCCA 191 (CanLII); |
Question 26 (1 point)
What important employment law issue is addressed in the Constitution Act, 1867?
In class 2, an Alberta Labour Relations Board decision was discussed in the context of determining whether work was employment. Please provide the full CanLII citation of this case.
In the case of Queen v Cognos Inc., the Supreme Court of Canada focused on which employer action:
Question 18 options:
| The employer had misrepresented the stability of the job to Queen during the hiring process. |
| The employer drug tested Queen (and all other employees) on a random basis. |
| The employer refused to accommodate Queen's physical disability. |
| Queen's direct supervisor harassed him as a consequence of performance issues. |
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started