Which of the following statements about crafting a strategy to be competitively successful in the markets for action cameras and drones IS true?

Whether a company is operating cost efficiently is not especially important in devising a successful and profitable strategy, so long as its sales$/$market shares of cameras $/$drones in the $4$ geographic regions are above the regional averages.

Once a company devises a strategy and set of competitive actions$/$efforts that is competitively successful, it does not have to pay much attention to responding and adjusting its strategy and competitive actions$/$efforts to combat the shifting strategies and competitive efforts of rival companies.

For a company to compete successfully, it needs to exert greater competitive efforts on all $11$ competitive factors for cameras and $10$ competitive factors for drones than every other rival company.

Very often the most appealing competitive approach a company can employ is a "more value for the money" strategy $($for example, selling $8-$star cameras and drones at lower prices than other $8-$star brands$)$ where your competitive advantage is an ability to incorporate "upscale" product attributes with high buyer appeal at a lower cost than rivals$--$and thereby underprice rival brands of cameras and drones having comparable attributes and $\frac{P}{Q}$ ratings.

In GLO$-$BUS, there are multiple strategic approaches and sets of competitive efforts$/$action that, if properly designed and wellexecuted, are capable of producing competitive success in the global market for cameras$/$drones$,$ provided they are not overpowered or thwarted by even more potent strategic approaches and competitive actions$/$efforts that are well$-$executed by rival companies.