Which of the following statements about crafting a strategy to be competitively successful in the markets for action cameras and drones is not true?

In GLO$-$BUS, there is no such thing as a surefire strategy or a "magic bullet" strategy or an undefeatable strategy that is "guaranteed" to outperform all other strategies, irrespective of the strategies and competitive actions undertaken by rival companies.

GLO$-$BUS has a built$-$in bias that favors the company that operates most cost$-$efficiently and produces cameras and drones with the highest $\frac{P}{Q}$ ratings.

In GLO$-$BUS, there are multiple strategic approaches and sets of competitive efforts$/$action that, if properly designed and well$-$executed, are capable of producing competitive success in the global market for cameras$/$drones$,$ provided they are not overpowered or thwarted by even more potent strategic approaches and competitive actions$/$efforts that are well$-$executed by rival companies.

So long as your company's competitive efforts$/$actions and decision entries produce an overall buyer appeal for your camera$/$drone product line that outranks the offerings of rival companies across the $4$ geographic regions and so long as your company exerts sufficiently aggressive competitive efforts $($on the $11$ competitive factors for cameras and $10$ competitive factors for drones$)$ that compares favorably with the competitive efforts of rivals in the $4$ regions, then you can expect a satisfactory$-$to$-$good$-$to$-$appealingly large percentage of buyers in each region to prefer purchasing your cameras$/$drones instead of rival company brands.

GLO$-$BUS has no built$-$in bias that favors any one strategy or approach to competing over all the others.