Which of the following statements about operator overloading is false?

Question $5$ options:

The precedence of an operator cannot be changed by overloading. As in algebra, parentheses can be used to force evaluation order of operators in an expression.

The left$-$to$-$right or right$-$to$-$left grouping of an operator cannot be changed by overloading. The "arity" of an operator$$that is$,$ whether it's a unary or binary operator$$cannot be changed. You cannot create new operators$$only existing operators can be overloaded.

The meaning of how an operator works on objects of built$-$in types cannot be changed$$you cannot, for example, change $+$ so that it subtracts two integers.

Operator overloading works only with objects of custom classes.