Which of the following statements best describes the difference between judicial activism and judicial restraint? Judicial activism is the practice of ensuring that laws enacted by Congress are judged unconstitutional immediately, while judicial restraint is the practice of not stating an official opinion. Judicial activism is the idea of upholding the Constitution and laws, while judicial restraint involves rulings based on personal opinions. Judicial restraint is the practice of strictly adhering to what is stated in the Constitution in decisions, while judicial activism involves rulings based on political ideology. Judicial restraint is the practice of restricting other judges from involving their