Which of the following statements istrue?

1. Law enforcement must get a warrant to search the contents of a cell phone.
2. A criminal defendant is always entitled to a jury trial.
3. The grand jury determines whether a defendant is guilty of a crime.
4. An attorney may not represent a defendantuntil after the arraignment.

Which of the following statements istrueabout general partnerships?

1. An agreement to to for a valid partnership must be in writing.
2. A partnership is dissolved upon the death of a partner.
3. General partners do not have personal liability for the debts of the partnership.
4. A partnership is subject to double taxation.

An S Corporation:

1. must have more than 100shareholders
2. can include both individuals and corporations as shareholders
3. is subject to double taxation
4. protects shareholders from personal liability

If an officer smells evidence of criminal activity, does the officer have to obtain a search warrant before searching the immediate area?

1. No, but only if the officer also sees evidence of criminal activity at the same time.
2. Yes, because a warrant is always required for officers to conduct a search.
3. No.Like the plain view doctrine, the plain smell doctrine is an exception to the warrant requirement.
4. Yes.While there is a plain view doctrine, there is no plain smell doctrine.

Sisters Betty and Karen orally agree to launch a website business and sell cookies using their mother's cookie recipe.The business is slow to start, only making about $100 profit the first three months, which the sisters equally split.Then, when cookie sales skyrocket, Karen tells Betty she is launching a website and intends to sell their mother's cookies on her own and keep the profits to herself.Which of the following statements is true?

1. Betty and Karen had an implied partnership to sell mother's cookies and share in the profits even though the partnership was never in writing
2. Betty can sue Karen for copyright infringement
3. There was no partnership because there was no written contrac
4. Whether Betty and Karen split the profits is not relevant in determining whether an implied partnership exists