Which of the following was the result in the case in the text, Novamedix Limited v. NDM Acquisition Corporation and Vesta Healthcare Inc., in which the plaintiff claimed that a settlement agreement was a contract for the sale of goods breached by the defendant because a type of medical slipper involved in the settlement agreement could not be resold?

A.	That the transaction would not be treated as a contract for the sale of goods because the predominant purpose of the settlement agreement was to settle a patent infringement lawsuit.

B.	That the transaction would not be treated as a contract for the sale of goods because it was a mixed type of transaction.

C.	That the transaction would not be treated as a contract for the sale of goods because of the involvement of medical treatment issues.

D.	That the transaction would be treated as a contract for the sale of goods because the essential nature of the agreement was the exchange of slippers for the release of a legal right.

E.	That the transaction would be treated as a contract for the sale of goods because it was a mixed type of transaction.