1. Which of the following would not qualify as an exchange of prestation?
2. An exchange of $50 for books
3. An exchange of cleaning work for renovation work
4. An exchange of $200 dollars for ideas.
5. An exchange of a car for a motorcycle
6. All could be a prestation

1. Which of the following is most accurate regarding a mandatory benefit from the property of a mandate?
2. A mandatory can never benefit from the property of a mandate
3. A mandatory can benefit from the property of a mandate because of incidental powers rights.
4. A mandatory can befit form the property of a mandate only if the mandator confirms
5. A mandatory can benefit from the property of a mandate only to cover persona expenses.
6. All the above are accurate

1. Which of the following meets the criteria for a simple administration?
2. A general mandate
3. A special mandate
4. A tacit mandate
5. All of the above
6. None of the above

1. A mandatory must personally perform the duties of a mandate. Which of the following is not an exception to this principle?
2. Mandatory appoints a third person in an emergency
3. Mandatory gets assistance from a third person
4. Mandator authorizes a third person to perform the mandate
5. All of the above are exceptions to the principle
6. Only a and b are exceptions

1. What is the effect of the mandatory ratifying the illegal acts of the mandator?
2. The mandator must pau the remuneration
3. The mandatory is not liable to the third person
4. The mandate will be deemed terminated
5. All of the above
6. None of the above

1. Buying a lottery ticket is what type of contract?
2. A unilateral contract
3. A commutative contract
4. An aleatory contract
5. A gratuitous contract
6. None of the above

1. To obtain a temporary (interlocutory) injunction, the party requesting it must prove which of the following?
2. Interest
3. Irreparable harm
4. Would suffer more
5. All of the above must be proven
6. None of the above because these conditions are only for the permanent injunction hearing.

1. Punitive damages were awarded as an exceptional remedy in which case?
2. Peter vs. Fiasche case
3. Dowel vs. Elis Case
4. Richard vs. Time Inc.
5. Girous vs. Malik case
6. None of the above

1. All of the following are contractual characteristics to a paid newspaper subscription, except:
2. Onerous
3. Commutative
4. Synallagmatic
5. All of the above are characteristics for a paid newspaper subscription
6. Only a and c are characteristics for a paid newspaper subscription

1. Bob and Ted are arguing about what form is required for contracts. Bob believes a contract can always be verbal and doesn't have to be written to be legal. Ted believes all contracts have to be written to be legal. Who is right?
2. Neither Bob nor Ted are right
3. Both Bob and Ted are right
4. Bob is right
5. Ted is right
6. None of the above

1. For which of the following are minors allowed to contract?
2. An employment contracts
3. Buying school materials
4. Starting a business
5. A minor can contract for any of the above
6. Only a and b

1. All of the following are characteristic of a penal clause except:
2. The clause requires specific performance of the obligation(s) of a contract
3. The clause forces a penalty on the party for failing to perform the obligation(s) of a contract
4. Present or future injury needs to be proven to exercise the penal clause
5. All of the above are characteristic of a penal clause
6. Both a and c are not characteristics of a penal clause

1. In which scenario is a contract formed?
2. When the parties exchange the agreed upon prestation
3. When the parties simply agree upon the exchange of prestations
4. When the parties sign a contract detailing the agreed upon prestation
5. When the parties agreeing to an exchange of a prestations are of adult age
6. None of the above

1. Which of the following is correct regarding the conclusion of the Peter vs. Fiasche case?
2. The contract was signed under fraud and therefore was annulled by the court on that basis.
3. The contract was signed under fraud and the Plaintiff received damaged as a result
4. The contract was illegal and therefore was annulled.
5. The cause of the contract was illegal, but the contract could not be annulled because the Plaintiff was a willing participant in the illegal bargain
6. None of the above.

1. A contract between two people, that has a synallagmatic characteristic, would be best described by which of the following statements?
2. The parties both negotiated the terms of the contract
3. Both parties are obligated to perform acts
4. One of the parties set the conditions of the contract
5. One of the parties is obligated to perform an act
6. None of the above

1. The legal concept "capacity to contract" can be most closely associated to:
2. Age
3. Consent
4. Form
5. Cause
6. All of the above

1. An airplane ticket to Toronto bought online would be
2. A unilateral contract
3. A commutative contract
4. An aleatory contract
5. A contract of mutual agreement
6. None of the above

1. Which of the following would be considered a mandatory?
2. A corporate director acting on behalf of the corporation
3. The hockey player who hires an agent
4. A stockholder buying securities for a client
5. All of the above
6. Only a and c

1. The "of right principle" is best associated to which of the following?
2. To enforce a contract
3. Contractual capacity to contract
4. Inferred rights of a mandate
5. Mandatory ability to hire an assistant
6. Mandatory right to compensation for expenses

1. In which of the following cases was the decision based on the representative having violated the obligations resulting from the contract of mandate?
2. The Dowel case
3. The Copiscope case
4. The Giroux case
5. None of the above
6. Both a and b

1. David has been saving for 20 years to buy a Shingal painting. He finally found one at a local art dealer and bought it for $25 000. He walked out of the gallery very happy with the deal he got. A few weeks later David discovers it is a fake. What can David argue to get back his money?
2. Error
3. Lesion
4. Fear
5. Both a and b
6. None of the above

1. In the Copiscope vs. TRM Copu case, which of the following most accurately Copiscope's failure to prove for the interlocutory (temporary) injunction?
2. It failed because the injunction request was not within 10 days of the hearing
3. It failed because the court found it was only possible to grant as part of the trial judgement decision
4. It failed because it was not an urgent matter
5. It failed for all of the above reasons
6. None of the above

1. James bought a used car froma car dealership. He drove the car off the lot very happy with the deal he got. A few weeks later. James is told that the price he paid is too much. What can be argued for James to get back his money?
2. Error by Fraud
3. Lesion
4. Fear
5. All of the above
6. Only a and b

1. Which of the following is accurate regarding a provisional injunction?
2. It is a possible court order if the interlocutory injunction requested by a plaintiff is proven
3. Both the plaintiff and the defendant must be present when argued
4. It is granted for a period of time until the interlocutory injunction hearing takes place
5. The plaintiff must demonstrate that without it there would be serious and irreparable harm
6. None of the above

1. Which of the following can't contract to start a business?
2. A minor
3. An adult
4. An inapt adult
5. Both a and c can't contract to start a busines
6. None of the above

1. Which of the following would not qualify as an exchange of prestation
2. An exchange of $50 dollars for books
3. An exchange of cleaning work for renovation work
4. An exchange of $200 dollars for ideas
5. An exchange of a car for a motorcycle
6. All could be a prestation.

1. Which of the following is inaccurate in interpreting clauses of a contract that is in dispute?
2. Abusive clauses are nul
3. Illegible or incomprehensible clause are always nul
4. A nullified clause does not make the whole contract invalid
5. In contracts of adhesion, accepting party is given benefit of doubt
6. All of the above are accurate

1. In which case, was the principle of confidence cited?
2. Peter vs Fiasche case
3. Dowel vs. Elis case
4. Girous vs. Malik case
5. Wong vs Leung
6. Richard vs. Time Inc

1. Best practices principle refers to what?
2. Mandate powers
3. Mandate remuneration
4. Mandates between two natural personal assumed free so remuneration must be expressed
5. Mandate with a professional assumes renumeration
6. None of the above

1. Fraud was argued successfully in which case?
2. Peter vs. Fiasche case
3. Dowel vs. Elis case
4. Giroux vs. Malik case
5. Both a and c
6. None of the above

1. All of the following are characteristics of a professional mandate, except:
2. A professional mandate has a presumed remuneration
3. A professional mandate must have express powers mentioned
4. A professional mandate must have inferred powers mentioned
5. All of the above are characteristics of a professional mandate
6. None of the above

1. Which of the following is true of the contract of mandate?
2. It is used only for representation in legal acts
3. It can be by a gratuitous title.
4. It is always presumed to be done in exchange for payment
5. Must always be an express formation
6. All of the above are true.

1. Heather posts on FB Marketplace a laptop for sell at $500. Which of the following may constitute acceptance?
2. Dan agreed upon a price, a time and a place to met, but on his way there he was killed in accident
3. Kelly counteroffered Heather for $450 and the two made plans to meet for the exchange
4. Steven sent an email agreeing to Heather's offer, but she fell into a comma.
5. James, a close friend to Heather, texts her that he wants the laptop for the price asked and she texts back an emoji smile.
6. All of the above unequivocally constitute acceptance

1. If I offer to rent you my apartment for $900 a month, your tacit acceptance would be best indicated by you:
2. Nodding your head to signify yes
3. An email saying "OK"
4. Saying "OK"
5. Sending a text messages with a thumb-up emoji
6. None of the above

1. What type of contract gives the accepting party the benefit of doubt if there is a dispute and it ends up in court?
2. A unilateral contract
3. A gratuitous contract
4. A synallagmatic contract
5. A cumulative contract
6. None of the above

1. A mandatory uses a third person to personal benefit from the property of a mandate, but in the end the mandatory discovers the value of the property acquired is less than what was assumed. Which of the following is accurate?
2. Only the third party may nul the contract of sale and free the mandatory of any responsibility
3. Only the mandatory can nullify the sale since they should not be personally benefiting from the property of a mandate
4. The act alone of a mandatory personally benefitting from the property of a mandate automatically nullifies the contract of sale.
5. Only the mandator can nullify the sale since they should not be personally benefiting from the property of a mandate
6. All of the above are accurate

1. Suzy asks Polly if she would like to buy her bike for $100 dollars. Polly says yes but asks Suzy for a lift to the garage so as to fill the tires with air. What is this?
2. Contract
3. An offer
4. A rejection
5. An acceptance
6. None of the above

1. Which of the following is accurate?
2. A contract is formed upon acceptance
3. A contract is formed when the parties complete the exchange
4. A contract is formed when there is cause
5. A contract is formed when there is an offer
6. All of the above

1. Which of the following is inaccurate?
2. Bob hires Dan to sell his house. This is a specific mandate.
3. Susan hires Saraj to find her a new job. This is a specific mandate.
4. Harry hires Samantha to manage his apartment building. This is a specific mandate
5. Jules hires harry to represent her in a legal case. This is a specific mandate
6. Steven hires Jane to draft a will. This is a specific mandate.

1. When can an agent, hired to sell a property, use a third person to buy the property for their own benefit?
2. There are no restrictions
3. Never
4. If the price is. A fair market values
5. With the mandator's knowledge
6. None of the above

1. The act of confirming best relates to which of the following?
2. The parties agree to contract
3. The mandatory accepts a mandate contract
4. The parties agree to bypass the terms of a contract
5. The mandator agrees to pay a mandatory for acts outside a mandate
6. None of the above.

1. Which of the following would best describe an extrajudicial default?
2. A deadline in a contract
3. A legal deadline
4. A written warning
5. All of the above
6. None of the above

1. How many ways exists for a contracting party to be put into default for failture to fulfill contractual obligations?
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. 5