1. Which of the two approaches could be aptly labeled price-led costing?
2. What is Lenos current selling price of item no. 8976?
3. If Leno used target costing for item no. 8976, what must happen to costs if the company desires to meet the market price and maintain its current rate of profit on sales? By how much? Increase or Reduce by ....... cost
4. Would the identification of value-added and non-value-added costs assist Leno in this situation? Y or N
5. Suppose that by previous cost-cutting drives, costs had already been pared to the bone on item no. 8976. What might Leno be forced to do with its markup on cost to remain competitive? By how much? (Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your percentage answer to 2 decimal places (i.e., .1234 should be entered as 12.34).) Increase/Reduced by.... %
6. In many industries, prices are the result of an interaction between market forces and costs. (T or F)

Required information [The following information applies to the questions displayed below] For many years, Leno Corporation has used a straightforward cost-plus pricing system, marking its goods up approximately 25 percent of total cost. The company has been profitable; however, it has recently lost considerable business to foreign competitors that have become very aggressive in the marketplace. These firms appear to be using target costing. An example of Leno's problem is typified by item no. 8976, which has the following unit-cost characteristics: $ 90 Direct material Direct labor 205 Manufacturing overhead Selling and administrative expenses 135 70 The going market price for an identical product of comparable quality is $540, which is significantly below what Leno is charging