Which one of the following is not usually an effective way to reduce production/assembly costs and/or marketing costs per action-capture camera sold in an effort to achieve a sizable low-cost competitive advantage over rivals? o Paying PAT members a total compensation package that results in labor costs per camera assembled that are not only below the industry-average benchmark (as reported on p. 6 of the Camera & Drone Journal) but close to the industry-low number o Keeping a watchful eye on warranty claim rates and warranty costs per camera sold and pursuing actions to keep them below the industry-average benchmark and, more ideally, close to the industry-low benchmark (as reported on p. 6 of the Camera & Drone Journal) Trying different combinations of components, product enhancements, and extra performance features to be used in action cameras in order to discover the lowest cost combination for achieving a competitively appealing P/Q rating Spending aggressively (even to the point of overspending) on camera product R&D Striving to keeping marketing costs per action camera sold in all 4 geographic regions to levels that are several dollars below the industry-average benchmark (as reported on p. 6 of the Camera & Drone Journal)