Question
Which one of the following statements is true? In the decision of Jarrold (Inspector of Taxes) v Boustead (1964) 3 All ER 76 it was
Which one of the following statements is true?
In the decision of Jarrold (Inspector of Taxes) v Boustead (1964) 3 All ER 76 it was held that the fee paid for the relinquishing of amateur status for life was ordinary income for the taxpayer. | |
In the decision of AAT Case 7422 none of the receipts received by the footballer taxpayer were held to be assessable income. | |
In the decision of Scott v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1966) 117 CLR 514 it was held that the gift of 10,000 pounds by a client to the solicitor was remuneration for services rendered. | |
In the decision of FCT v Whitfords Beach Pty Ltd 82 ATC 4031 it was held that the subdivision and sale of the land had gone beyond the mere realisation of a capital asset, and the sale receipts were assessable income. | |
In the decision of FCT v Rowe 97 ATC 4317 the gratuitous (non-compulsory) reimbursement by the Queensland Government of a taxpayer s legal costs was held to be assessable income for the taxpayer. |
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started