Which statement best explains the significance of the development of the Corinthian capital for the history of architecture? Question 2 options: Use of the Corinthian capital allowed architects to eliminate the bases of the columns, allowing for more free space on the stylobate for visitors to walk around. Use of the Corinthian capital with a Doric frieze eliminated the "corner problem" presented by the Ionic capital, but still required modifications to account for the strict rules of the Doric frieze. Use of the Corinthian capital with an Ionic frieze eliminated both of the "corner problems" presented by the strict rules of the Doric frieze and the Ionic capital's particular bi-frontal design. Use of the Corinthian capital required more skilled masons to carve the intricate designs, boosting the construction economy in Hellenistic Greek cities