While it may even be questionable that the research team reported a significant result at the 0.05 level based upon our findings in question 1, let's observe the major impact a slight change makes in our calculation. Recalculate the p-value from part 1, but let's pretend that 18 of the 22 participants in the high-power group took the gambling risk.This new p-value speaks to the volatility of results when low sample sizes are used.Round this p-value to 3 decimal places.