Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

While preparing its year 3 financial statements, Dek Corp. discovered computational errors in its year 2 and year 1 depreciation expense. These errors resulted in

While preparing its year 3 financial statements, Dek Corp. discovered computational errors in its year 2 and year 1 depreciation expense. These errors resulted in overstatement of each years income by $25,000, net of income taxes. The following amounts were reported in the previously issued financial statements:

Year 2 Year 1
Retained earnings, 1/1 $700,000 $500,000
Net income 150,000 200,000
Retained earnings, 12/31 $850,000 $700,000

Deks year 3 income is correctly reported at $180,000. Which of the following amounts should be adjusted to retained earnings and presented for net income in Deks year 3 and year 2 comparative financial statements?

Year

Retained earnings

Net income

year 2

year 3

--

($50,000)

150,000

180,000

year 2

year 3

($50,000)

--

$150,000

180,000

year 2

year 3

($50,000)

--

$125,000

180,000

year 2

year 3

--

--

$125,000

180,000

This Answer is Correct (Answer is below)

year 2

year 3

($50,000)

--

$125,000

180,000

This answer is correct. ASC Topic 250 requires that items of profit or loss related to the correction of an error in the financial statements of a prior period be accounted for and reported as prior period adjustments and excluded from the determination of net income for the current period. When comparative financial statements are prepared, it is necessary to adjust net income, its components, retained earnings balances, and other affected balances for all of the periods presented to reflect retroactive application of prior period adjustments. Hence, the amounts for each period must be stated in the comparative statements as if the errors had not occurred. Thus, both year 1 and year 2 net income and retained earnings would be retroactively reduced by $25,000 to reflect the correct amounts for each period. After these adjustments are made, the amounts for year 3 will be correctly stated. Note that this retroactive treatment is only used for presentation purposes in the comparative financial statements. The actual journal entry made to correct retained earnings at 1/1/Y3 is

Retained earnings 50,000
Accumulated depreciation 50,000

I don't understand why the answer below is correct for this problem regardless of explanation above? Can please explain why this is the answer in a easier way so I can understand? Also why is retained earnings in Year 2 ($50,000)

year 2

year 3

($50,000)

--

$125,000

180,000

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

How To Perform A Building Water Audit

Authors: Troy Aichele

1st Edition

1651578273, 978-1651578278

More Books

Students also viewed these Accounting questions