Question
While preparing its year 3 financial statements, Dek Corp. discovered computational errors in its year 2 and year 1 depreciation expense. These errors resulted in
While preparing its year 3 financial statements, Dek Corp. discovered computational errors in its year 2 and year 1 depreciation expense. These errors resulted in overstatement of each years income by $25,000, net of income taxes. The following amounts were reported in the previously issued financial statements:
Year 2 | Year 1 | |
---|---|---|
Retained earnings, 1/1 | $700,000 | $500,000 |
Net income | 150,000 | 200,000 |
Retained earnings, 12/31 | $850,000 | $700,000 |
Deks year 3 income is correctly reported at $180,000. Which of the following amounts should be adjusted to retained earnings and presented for net income in Deks year 3 and year 2 comparative financial statements?
Year | Retained earnings | Net income | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
year 2 year 3 | -- ($50,000) | 150,000 180,000 | ||
year 2 year 3 | ($50,000) -- | $150,000 180,000 | ||
year 2 year 3 | ($50,000) -- | $125,000 180,000 | ||
year 2 year 3 | -- -- | $125,000 180,000 |
This Answer is Correct (Answer is below)
year 2 year 3 | ($50,000) -- | $125,000 180,000 |
This answer is correct. ASC Topic 250 requires that items of profit or loss related to the correction of an error in the financial statements of a prior period be accounted for and reported as prior period adjustments and excluded from the determination of net income for the current period. When comparative financial statements are prepared, it is necessary to adjust net income, its components, retained earnings balances, and other affected balances for all of the periods presented to reflect retroactive application of prior period adjustments. Hence, the amounts for each period must be stated in the comparative statements as if the errors had not occurred. Thus, both year 1 and year 2 net income and retained earnings would be retroactively reduced by $25,000 to reflect the correct amounts for each period. After these adjustments are made, the amounts for year 3 will be correctly stated. Note that this retroactive treatment is only used for presentation purposes in the comparative financial statements. The actual journal entry made to correct retained earnings at 1/1/Y3 is
Retained earnings | 50,000 | ||
Accumulated depreciation | 50,000 |
I don't understand why the answer below is correct for this problem regardless of explanation above? Can please explain why this is the answer in a easier way so I can understand? Also why is retained earnings in Year 2 ($50,000)
year 2 year 3 | ($50,000) -- | $125,000 180,000 |
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started