Whole statutes 1) what are the three core objectives of good legislative design? 2) What are the main features of those core objectives? 3) Identify 4 principles of good legislative design that we have looked at in lectures. 4) What do we mean by a "policy gap"? 5) Was there a "policy gap" in the case of the development of the HDCA? If so, what was it? 6) Was there a "policy gap" in the case of the development of the Gang Insignia legislation? If so, what was it? 7) What is one way of determining if legislation meets the principles of good legislative design? 8) What is the stated purpose of the Prohibition of Gang Insignia in Government Premises Act 2013? 9) What do extrinsic aids reveal about what motivated the passage of the Prohibition of Gang Insignia in Government Premises Act 2013? 10) How did the Law Commission's proposed purpose clause differ from the purpose clause eventually enacted in the HDCA? 11) The original idea for a Communication Tribunal in the New Media Bill was dropped by the time the Bill became law. What legislative design principle was relevant to that dropping? 12) How does the Approved Agency uphold the purpose of the HDCA and the core objective of accessibility? 13) How might the penal presumption feature in legislative design AND interpretation (think of: the protection of individual liberty) 14) How might the principle of upholding access to justice apply in the design and in the interpretation of the HDCA? 15) How might the principles that freedom of speech should be protected and that victims should have (workable) access to justice feature in the design of the HDCA