Question
Why, according to Chief Justice McLachlin's ruling in Ward v Canada (Attorney General), is s. 27 of the Marine Mammal Regulations a permissible exercise of
Why, according to Chief Justice McLachlin's ruling inWard v Canada (Attorney General),is s. 27 of theMarine Mammal Regulationsa permissible exercise of the Federal government's power to manage the fisheries under s. 91(12) of theConstitution Act, 1867, even though it affects the province of Newfoundland and Labrador's power to regulate property within its territory under s. 92(13) of theConstitution Act, 1867?Why, according to the Supreme Court of Canada's ruling inReference re Senate Reform, is it not permissible for Parliament or the provincial legislatures to unilaterally introduce a process of consultative elections to determine the appointment of Senator's, even though that process would not alter the wording of theConstitution Act, 1867?Why, according to the Supreme Court of Canada's ruling in theSenate Reference, would the abolition of the Senate require the unanimous consent of all 10 provinces, the House of Commons, and the Senate?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started