Why did Georgia succeed in getting an injunction from the United States Supreme Court when plaintiffs in Madison v. Ducktown Sulphur, Copper & Iron Co. had been refused such relief by the Tennessee Supreme Court?Justice Holmes suggests that in fashioning a remedy for a public nuisance, the Court has less latitude to balance the equities because the plaintiff is a sovereign state. What is his rationale for this conclusion? Is this why the Court ultimately held that Georgia was entitled to an injunction?