Why do Daly and Hickel think that economic growth must end?Why does they think that continued economic growth will do more harm than good, and that growth cannot be green? Do you agree?

Do you think there are significant differences in their views?

What if any points did you find particularly interesting or particularly unclear or hard to understand in Daly and Hickel?

Please only use The references below to answer Th e question

Herman Daly (2005) "Economics in a full world"Scientific American293:100-107

Jason Hickel (2018) "Why growth can't be green"