Why does the unanimous Supreme Court of Canada inCarter v Canada (Attorney General)maintain that the trial judge was allowed to reconsider the 1993 SCCruling inRodriguez?Which principle of fundamental justice is violated by the universal prohibition on medical assistance with dying according to the SCC inCarter, and why do they maintain that principle is violated?What, according to Justice Abella's majority ruling inFraser v Canada (Attorney General), are the two requirements that need to be fulfilled to show that s. 15(1) of theCharterhas been violated?What, according to Abella J's majority ruling in Fraser, is 'adverse impact discrimination'? What are the two types of evidence she identifies as showing that adverse impact discrimination is present?