Why is human resource differentiation problematic in organisations that claim to have an inclusive culture?

When addressing this question, consider the concepts of strategic choice and human resource (HR) architecture on various stakeholders in dynamic organisational contexts.

The article Kwong, K. and Jang, S. (2022), 'There is no good war for talent: a critical review of the literature on talent managemen Download There is no good war for talent: a critical review of the literature on talent management', Employee Relations: The International Journal, Vol. 44, No.1, pp. 94-120 will help you with this question and should be included as one of your references.

Criteria Critical analysis Research Structure and argument Clarity of written expression Referencing Mo Pass Unclear or minimal understanding demonstrated. Fails to answer the set question. Feproduces information from learning materials and readings. Owver- reliance on quotes and paraphrasing. Inadequate use of source material. Disjointed, not focused and/or poorly structured argument. Disconnected paragraphs; no clear line of argument. Poor communication of ideas due to careless writing and lack of proofreading. Unacceptable number of Errors. Assignment 1 marking gwide Pass S0-64% Demonstrates a basic and clear understanding of the topic under investigation. Only uses the minimurm number of sources and relies heavily on only a few key articles for most of the evidence used in the essay. Organisation of ideas is relatively clear, but structure and development of argument may require further justification. A satisfactory standard of EXPression. Few spelling and/or grammar EITOrs. Credit &65-74% Demonstrates a developed understanding of the topic under investigation. Able to identify relevant and contrasting arguments. Goes well beyond minimum of six SOUCES. A coherent line of argument throughout. Introduction, body and conclusion are logically developed and integrated. Consistent ExXpression. Use of advanced language and HEM specific terminology and conventions. Distinction 75-84% Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the topic under investigation. Able to accurately interpret evidence and statements. Utilises a good range of SOUFCES in an original way. Able to construct a coherent line of argument throughout, and to effectively synthesise and integrate abstract ideas. Well written essay with few if any errors in syntax and grammar. Excellent use of HRM specific terminology. High Distinction 85-100% Demonstrates an excellent understanding, showing reasoning. self- confidence and originality. Clearly demonstrates a high level of integration of readings and/or alternative perspectives into own writing. Logical structure enables a valid and sophisticated development of argument throughout entire essay that is fully Convincing. Excellent written expression and superior grammar and syntax skills. Work has a clear voice. Inadequate, inappropriate or inaccurate referencing that does not conform to the conventions of Harvard Referencing may result in the essay receiving a fail grade overall and the possibility of academic misconduct. Marks may be deducted for poor referencing technigue. but marks will not be awarded for appropriate referencing technigue