Question
Why promissory estoppel has been considered as an independent cause of action (a sword) after the High Court's decision in Waltons Store but in NSW,
Why promissory estoppel has been considered as an independent cause of action (a sword) after the High Court's decision in Waltons Store but in NSW, it is still considered as a defence supporting other cause of actions, such as in contract or property law, only? Why it cannot be considered as a sword like proprietary estoppel?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started
Law Express Human Rights
Authors: Claire De Than
5th Edition
1292210214, 978-1292210216
