1. Why should the commercial constitute an offer? Argue that it did?
2. Did leonard accept the offer? Explain how he accepted the offer.
3. Did both Leonard and Pepsi give consideration? If yes, what consideration did Leonard give? What consideration did Pepsi give
4. Does Pepsi have any viable defenses (e.g., fraud, duress, violation of public policy) against the creation of a contract? What are arguments against these defenses? Rememeber, as Leonard's representative you don't want Pepsi to present any viable defenses.
5. Why should the commercial constitute an offer? Argue that it did.
6. Did Leonard accept the offer? Explain how he accepted the offer.
7. Did both Lonard and Pepsi give consideration? If yes, what consideration did Leonard give? What consideration did Pepsi give?
8. Does Pepsi have any viable defenses (e.g., fraud, duress, violation of public policy) against the creation of a contract? What are arguments against these defenses? Remember, as Leonard's representative you don't ant Pepsi to present any viable defenses.

Defendant Questionaire

1. Why did the commercial not constitute an offer? ARgue that it wasn't an offer.
2. Why did Leonard's submission of the check, 15 Pepsi points, and the Order Form not constitute an acceptance? ARgue that it wasn't an acceptance.
3. Was there consideration given by Pepsi and Leonard? If yes, what was it? Why shouldn't it be consideration?
4. What affirmative defenses (e.g., dufeses, fraud, public policy) will you present?