Why specifically does Kapcynski disagree with the neoliberal argument for the IP regime, and why does she think that this neoliberal argument does not actually justify IP law as it exists practice? Why does she think that neoliberal take on IP is self-contradictory in its view of the state?

This is also a thread to discuss anything you found especially interesting or unclear in Kapcynski.

Amy Kapczynski, "Intellectual property's leviathan" (2014).Yale Faculty Scholarship Series. 4916.