why was the vendor product owners suggestion of proceeding based on value stream maps alone problematic? explain your answer.

Case Study 8.1 . Daily Business Support in a Large Corporation During his daily scrums, Imran found that there were a number of tasks that re- mained or were moved into the blocked category due to lack of access to business experts. Team members identified that it was difficult to pull their business con- tacts away from their day-to-day responsibilities. The vendor product owner identified sprint periods as being four weeks in length, based on previous implementations. During the scrum, the vendor product owner suggested that the team proceed as best as it could, based on the knowl- edge the team members had acquired during value stream mapping activities. Imran was concerned that without regular business interaction, his team might produce outputs that did not align with the business's expectations. This could put the project at risk and could result in leaving out highly desirable requirements. Imran decided to establish a weekly user-group committee where business stakeholders would attend and answer questions and provide feedback on work in progress. Imran decided to break user groups into modules to ensure that partici- pants felt their time was being valued. After the initial meeting, Imran recognized the need for committees to have terms of reference to guide the discussion and meeting logistics. Within two weeks of the introduction of committee meetings, the number of items in a blocked state was reduced, and the team members were feeling more confident about their work and interactions with business. A residual benefit to setting up committees was that business stakeholders became more open to ad-hoc conversations with the development team