Question
Will Pugh, director of cost operations for MicroPak, wishes to develop an accurate cost function to explain and predict support costs in the companys printed
Will Pugh, director of cost operations for MicroPak, wishes to develop an accurate cost function to explain and predict support costs in the company’s printed circuit board assembly operation. Mr. Pugh is concerned that the cost function he currently uses – based on direct labor costs – is not accurate enough for proper planning and control of support costs. Mr. Pugh directed one of his financial analysts to obtain a random sample of 25 weeks of support costs and three possible cost drivers in the circuit-board assembly department: direct labor hours, number of boards assembled and average cycle time of boards assembled. (Average cycle time is the average time between start and certified completion – after quality testing – of boards assembled during a week.) Mr. Pugh wants his analyst to use regression analysis to demonstrate which cost driver best explains support costs.
Week | Assembly Support costs (Y) | Direct Labor Hours (X1) | Number of completed boards (X2) | Average Cycle Time (Hours) (X3) | |
1 | $66,402 | 7,619 | 2,983 | 186.44 | |
2 | $56,943 | 7,678 | 2,830 | 139.14 | |
3 | $50,337 | 7,816 | 2,413 | 151.13 | |
4 | $50,096 | 7,659 | 2,221 | 138.30 | |
5 | $64,241 | 7,646 | 2,701 | 158.63 | |
6 | $60,846 | 7,765 | 2,656 | 148.71 | |
7 | $43,119 | 7,685 | 2,495 | 105.85 | |
8 | $63,412 | 7,962 | 2,128 | 174.02 | |
9 | $59,283 | 7,793 | 2,127 | 155.30 | |
10 | $60,070 | 7,732 | 2,127 | 162.20 | |
11 | $53,345 | 7,771 | 2,338 | 142.97 | |
12 | $65,027 | 7,842 | 2,685 | 176.08 | |
13 | $58,220 | 7,940 | 2,602 | 150.19 | |
14 | $65,406 | 7,750 | 2,029 | 194.06 | |
15 | $35,268 | 7,954 | 2,136 | 100.51 | |
16 | $46,394 | 7,768 | 2,046 | 137.47 | |
17 | $71,877 | 7,764 | 2,786 | 197.44 | |
18 | $61,903 | 7,635 | 2,822 | 164.69 | |
19 | $50,009 | 7,849 | 2,178 | 141.95 | |
20 | $49,327 | 7,869 | 2,244 | 123.37 | |
21 | $44,703 | 7,576 | 2,195 | 128.25 | |
22 | $45,582 | 7,557 | 2,370 | 106.16 | |
23 | $43,818 | 7,569 | 2,016 | 131.41 | |
24 | $62,122 | 7,672 | 2,515 | 154.88 | |
25 | $52,403 | 7,653 | 2,942 | 140.07 |
Instructions: The questions that follow pertain to the above data set. Enter your responses in the spaces where indicated. This problem will require the use of MS Excel and/or StatPlus to estimate regression models.
Required:
Use regression analysis to estimate separate cost functions for each of the three potential cost drivers (i.e., estimate the regressions separately for X1, X2 and X3, rather than a single regression that includes all three variables) and then respond to the questions below. Make sure that you properly identify your "Y" and "X" variables in your regression program.
In addition to the discussion questions, you will attach your worksheet that includes your output for each of the three regressions.
A) Based on your regression results, enter the cost functions (using good form) for each of the three cost drivers.
B) Based on your analyses of the regression results, which is the best cost driver for support costs? Why?
C) What is the economic interpretation of the best cost function?
Step by Step Solution
3.53 Rating (156 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Y with respect to X1 Model 1 R Model 1 048 Model 1 R Square 002 041 a Predict...Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started