Willis Company has been in operation for three years. The company produces and sells a single product. Willis uses a standard costing system. Willis Company has the following absorption costing income statements for its first three years of operation.

2016 2017 2018 Sales in units 40,000 40,000 50,000 Production in units 40,000 50,000 40,000 Revenues $2,100,000 $2,100,000 $2,625,000 Cost of goods sold Beginning inventory 0 0 $475,000 Production $1,900,000 $2,375,000 $1,900,000 Available for sale $1,900,000 $2,375,000 $2,375,000 Less: Ending inventory 0 $475,000 0 Less: Production volume variance $250,000 Cost of goods sold $1,900,000 $1,650,000 $2,375,000 Gross margin $200,000 $450,000 $250,000 Selling and Administrative costs (all fixed) $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 Operating Income $0 $250,000 $50,000 Fixed manufacturing overhead costs per year $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Denominator level of activity used 40,000 units 40,000 units 40,000 units

Angela Lyman, a dress designer with no accounting background, was told that the breakeven volume for her company is 40,000 units per year. She is somewhat confused with the results shown above. In 2016 when 40,000 units were sold the company broke even (zero operating income). In 2017 when 40,000 units were sold the company had a profit of $250,000. Then in 2018 when 50,000 units were sold the profit was lower than the 2017 results. With the increase in sales, she thought her profit would be larger than it was in 2017. The selling price per unit remained the same over the three year period as did all the fixed (in total) and variable (per unit) costs.

1. Calculate the break-even point based on the information provided.

2. Prepare a variable costing income statement for each of the three years.

3. Reconcile the differences in the operating incomes under variable costing and absorption costing.

4. Explain to Angela why there is a difference between variable and absorption operating incomes in the 2017 and 2018.