Winona Ryder was arrested for shoplifting from Saks Fifth Avenue. The charges against her included theft and burglary for taking $5,600 in merchandise from Saks's Beverly Hills store. The jury selection process in the trial uncovered the fact that Peter Guber, a Hollywood executive who was in charge of three films that starred Ms. Ryder (Bram Stoker's Dracula, The Age of Innocence, Little Women), was among the pool of jurors. When questioned by the judge, Mr. Guber assured him that he could be impartial in judging the evidence. Mr. Guber was allowed to remain on the jury. What argument could the prosecution have made against keeping Mr. Guber? What argument could the defense have made against Mr. Guber? What process could each side have used to have him removed from the jury?

Most importantly, how can knowing this benefit yourself and others.

What would you recommend?