Without repeating answers provided in a prior week: Discuss a court case or news story involving private security operative either accused, or found liable: Under vicarious liability for the torts of another; For a 42 U.S.C. 1983 violation. Discuss a court case or news story involving a private security operative either investigating, or apprehending a suspect, or testifying in a case involving: Vicarious liability for the torts of another; A 42 U.S.C. 1983 violation. What causes of action must employers be concerned about in hiring, retaining, disciplining, and terminating personnel? Businesses often feel that the hiring of security companies as independent contractors will shield them from potential liability. Is this belief generally dependable? Name the types of remedies that exist under 42 U.S.C. 1983 Does moonlighting give greater strength to a plaintiff's or claimant's argument that civil rights have been violated under 42 U.S.C. 1983?

4